La Guerra Imperial empezó el mismo día
en que la Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas Soviéticas
perdió la Guerra Fría y se desintegró.
Marcos González Sedano
http://www.lahaine.org/est_espanol.php/estamos-en-guerra-imperial-la
Turquia derriba avion ruso bajo la mentira de que habia violado su espacio aereo. En la vertical hacia tierra que describe el avion al ser abatido...fue a dar a Siria.
No hay que tener gran imaginacion ni haber leido mucha historia del curriculum vitae et mortis de los bandidos imperialistas para montar la plausible hipotesis de que toda la operacion fue organizada desde el Project for the New American Century (PNAC) que es para el que trabaja EUROPUSA.
Esperemos que Rusia aprenda de una vez con qué clase de forajidos internacionales esta lidiando y deje, de una vez por todas, de llamarles con el absurdo y ridiculo titulo de "socios" a sus enemigos mortales
Esperemos que Rusia salga muy pronto de la ilusion de que con los Gangsters de EUROPUSA se puede colaborar y negociar.
Ya perdió la "guerra fria" frente a esta jauría imperial, y si Putin sigue bajandose los pantalones frente a sus "socios" y "part-ners", que lo unico que quieren es llevar a cabo el sueño de Hitler con una exitosa operacion "Barbarrosa" que conquiste las enormes riquezas de Rusia, van a perder esta "guerra caliente" que tan minuciosamente y criminalmente la EUROPUSA esta montando contra el pueblo ruso.
Estamos totalmente de acuerdo con Paul Craig Roberts:
"If Russia does not join the real game and begin to play its strong cards, Russia will be defeated"
Y ésta es una tremenda responsabilidad histórica porque tras una posible caída de Rusia a manos de las hienas y chacales de la civilización occidental, caería la entera Humanidad.
::::::::::::::::::::::::
Turkey Has Destroyed Russia’s Hope Of Western Cooperation
Paul Craig Roberts
Turkey’s unprovoked shoot-down of a Russian military aircraft over Syria raises interesting questions.
It seems unlikely that the Turkish government would commit an act of war against a much more powerful neighbor unless Washington had cleared the attack.
Turkey’s government is not very competent, but even the incompetent know better than to put themselves into a position of facing Russia alone.
If the attack was cleared with Washington, was Obama bypassed by the neocons who control his government, or is Obama himself complicit?
Clearly the neoconservatives are disturbed by the French president’s call for unity with Russia against ISIL and easily could have used their connections to Turkey to stage an event that Washington can use to prevent cooperation with Russia.
Washington’s complicity is certainly indicated, but it is not completely out of the question that the well-placed Turks who are purchasing oil from ISIL took revenge against Russia for destroying their oil tanker investments and profitable business.
But if the attack has a private or semi-private origin in connections between gangsters and military, would Turkey’s president have defended the shoot-down on such spurious grounds as “national defense”?
No one can believe that one Russian jet is a threat to Turkey’s security.
Don’t expect the presstitutes to look into any such questions. The presstitutes, such as the BBC’s Moscow correspondent Sarah Rainsford, are spinning the story that the loss of the Russian aircraft, and earlier the airliner, proves that Putin’s policy of air strikes against iSIL has backfired as Russians are not safer.
The responses to the shoot-down are also interesting. From what I heard of Obama’s press conference, Obama’s definition of “moderate Syrian rebels” includes all the extremist jihadish groups, such as al Nursa and ISIL, that are the focus of the Russian attacks. Only Assad is an extremist.
Obama, following the neocon line, says that Assad has too much blood on his hands to be allowed to remain president of Syria.
Obama is not specific about the “blood on Assad’s hands,” but we can be. The blood is the blood of ISIL forces fighting the Syrian army. Obama doesn’t refer to the blood on ISIL’s hands, but even the presstitutes have told us the horror stories associated with the blood on ISIL’s hands, with whom Obama has allied us.
And what about the blood on Obama’s hands?
Here we are talking about a very large quantity of blood: the blood of entire countries—Libya, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, and the blood that Obama’s puppet government in Kiev has spilled of the ethnic Russian inhabitants of Ukraine, not to forget the Palestinian blood spilled by Israel using US supplied weapons.
If the blood on Assad’s hands disqualifies Assad from office, the much greater quantity on Obama’s hands disqualifies Obama. And Cameron. And Hollande. And Merkel. And Netanyahu.
Throughout the entire Washington orchestrated conflicts in the Middle East, Africa, and Ukraine, the Russian government has spoken reasonably and responded in a diplomatic manner to the many provocations.
The Russian government relied on European governments realizing that Europe does not benefit from conflicts generated by Washington and separating themselves from a policy that is against their interests.
But Europe proved to be a collection of American vassals, not independent countries capable of independent foreign policies.
In its campaign against ISIL in Syria, the Russian government relied on the agreement made with NATO countries to avoid engaging in the air.
Now Turkey has violated this agreement.
I will be surprised if the Russian government any longer places any trust in the words of the West and any hope in diplomacy with the West.
By now the Russian government and the Russian people will have learned that the Wolfowitz doctrine means what it says and is in force against Russia.
From the Ukrainian attack on Crimea’s power supply and the blackout that is affecting Crimea, the Russian government has also learned that Washington’s puppet government in Kiev intends further conflict with Russia.
Washington has made it clear from the beginning that Washington’s focus is on overthrowing Assad, not ISIL.
Despite the alleged attack on France by ISIL, the US State Department press spokesperson, Admiral John Kirby, said that Russia cannot be a member of the coalition against ISIL until Russia stops propping up Assad.
To the extent that the shoot-down of the Russian military aircraft has a silver lining, the incident has likely saved the Russian government from a coalition in which Russia would have lost control of its war against ISIL and would have had to accept the defeat of Assad’s removal.
Each step along the way the Russian government has held strong cards that it did not play, trusting instead to diplomacy. Diplomacy has now proven to be a deadend.
If Russia does not join the real game and begin to play its strong cards, Russia will be defeated.
