"El Pentagono concluye que América
no estará segura hasta
que no se conquiste el mundo"
Paul Craig Robert
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/07/10/pentagon-concludes-america-safe-unless-conquers-world-paul-craig-roberts-3/
This 2015 National Military Strategy addresses the need to counter revisionist states that are challenging international norms as well as violent extremist organizations (VEOs) that are undermining transregional security. We are working with allies and partners to deter, deny, and – when necessary – defeat potential state adversaries. Concurrently, we are leading multiple coalition efforts to disrupt, degrade, and defeat VEOs. Central to these efforts is strengthening our global network of allies and partners. This integrated strategy requires us to conduct synchronized operations around the globe, implement institutional reforms at home, and sustain the capabilities, capacity, and readiness required to prevail in conflicts that may differ significantly in scope, scale, and duration.
"While Russia has contributed in select security areas, such as counternarcotics and counterterrorism, it also has repeatedly demonstrated that it does not respect the sovereignty of its neighbors and it is willing to use force to achieve its goals. Russia’s military actions are undermining regional security directly and through proxy forces. These actions violate numerous agreements that Russia has signed in which it committed to act in accordance with international norms, including the UN Charter, Helsinki Accords, Russia-NATO Founding Act, Budapest Memorandum, and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
Iran also poses strategic challenges to the international community. It is pursuing nuclear and missile delivery technologies despite repeated United Nations Security Council resolutions demanding that it cease such efforts. It is a state-sponsor of terrorism that has undermined stability in many nations, including Israel, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. Iran’s actions have destabilized the region and brought misery to countless people while denying the Iranian people the prospect of a prosperous future.
North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technologies also contradicts repeated demands by the international community to cease such efforts. These capabilities directly threaten its neighbors, especially the Republic of Korea and Japan. In time, they will threaten the U.S. homeland as well. North Korea also has conducted cyber attacks, including causing major damage to a U.S. corporation."
We support China’s rise and encourage it to become a partner for greater international security. However, China’s actions are adding tension to the Asia-Pacific region. For example, its claims to nearly the entire South China Sea are inconsistent with international law. The international community continues to call on China to settle such issues cooperatively and without coercion. China has responded with aggressive land reclamation efforts that will allow it to position military forces astride vital international sea lanes.
None of these nations are believed to be seeking direct military conflict with the United States or our allies. Nonetheless, they each pose serious security concerns which the international community is working to collectively address by way of common policies, shared messages, and coordinated action."
http://news.usni.org/2015/07/02/document-2015-us-national-military-strategy
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
El documento anuncia un transcendental giro en la política exterior del Imperium:
un estructural mutatis mutandis
que pasa de la "War on Terrorism"
a la guerra contra los estados que obstaculizan la hegemónica Agenda Imperial
del Project for the New American Century, PNAC,
o, como lo pone Paul Roberts:
"The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to “state actors” that “are challenging international norms.”
These “revisionist states” are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent."
Es decir: todo país independiente,
toda nación que no siga los dictums de America,
del imperialismo, desafia la Ley Internacional,
desafia la Ley de Washington.
Y de aqui que Paul Roberts haya colimado exactamente el título de su artículo
de que el Pentagono ha llegado
a la tácita conclusión,
a la tácita conclusión,
en su National Military Strategy, 2015, (NMS)
de que la seguridad imperial
sólo puede ser proporcionada
por "la conquista del mundo".
Es, en términos concisos, sin piruetas tropológicas
ni barrocos orwellianismos:
una declaración de guerra a la humanidad
en cuánto que en el manifiesto del Pentagono
se hace obvio que la única manera posible
que Washington ve viable su hegemonía mundial
es eliminando del mapa
a todo oponente y competidor.
(En realidad, ellos no tiene oponentes
--None of these nations are believed to be seeking direct military conflict with the United States or our allies--,
son ellos los oponentes y competidores
de los otros)
Las declaraciones de "Fighting Joe",
--en el post anterior--,
el nuevo Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
corrobora más allá de toda duda
lo implícito y subyacente en la NMS.
(En realidad, ellos no tiene oponentes
--None of these nations are believed to be seeking direct military conflict with the United States or our allies--,
son ellos los oponentes y competidores
de los otros)
Las declaraciones de "Fighting Joe",
--en el post anterior--,
el nuevo Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
corrobora más allá de toda duda
lo implícito y subyacente en la NMS.
