Vamos a ver:
¿Quíen, con un dedo y medio de cortex cerebral en su cranium, cree en las "elecciones" capitalistas?
Por ejemplo:
¿Quíen, que no sea un retrasado mental, puede creer que la clase social en el poder va a poner "a votos" si ellos continúan o no en el poder, si pierden sus propiedades y riquezas en favor de lo que "diga la mayoría"?
Por ejemplo:
En España: ¿se puede creer, sin insultar la inteligencia de los españoles, que la mafia de delincuentes, corruptos ladrones, del Partido Popular puede ser el Partido que saque más "votos"?
(Aunque no es de extrañar porque en la época de Franco, éste ganaba siempre con el 101 por ciento de ventaja)
Lo increíble es que todo esto se haga en la PLUTOCRACIA en nombre de la DEMOCRACIA.
Esto si que es el no-va-más.
Pues en los USAdores,
líder modélico de ésta estafa colosal, pasa igual.
Tomemos un artículo de Vicky Peláez, titulado:
"ESTADOS UNIDOS: CRONICA DE UN FRAUDE ELECTORAL ANUNCIADO"
El fraude electoral a través de la historia parece de nunca acabar. Mientras más avanza la tecnología, más sofisticado es el engaño orquestado por los más ricos y poderosos en diferentes puntos del planeta.
En el caso norteamericano, dónde en unos días se realizará la elección presidencial, el dinero facilita la tarea de manipular a la opinión pública a través de los medios de comunicación globalizados a su servicio para convertir a la mayoría de sus ciudadanos en unos zombis dispuestos a aceptar la mentira como la verdad y la fantasía como la realidad.
En un reciente artículo el ex subsecretario del Tesoro de la administración Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts afirmó (A), refiriéndose a las denuncias del candidato presidencial republicano, Donald Trump, sobre las 'encuestas falsas' y sobre el 'fraude electoral' para el próximo 8 de noviembre, que "las elecciones fraudulentas son una tradición norteamericana".
La historia electoral del país está llena de millones de muertos que participan en las elecciones, de otros millones que votan más de una vez o cuyos datos son inexactos o incorrectos. Y ni que decir tiene, los frecuentes robos de votos, coacciones, existencia de papeletas confusas o 'errores programados' en las máquinas electrónicas de votación.
Los hermanos James y Kenneth Collier, publicaron en 1992 el libro, 'Votescam: The Stealing of America' ('Estafa Electoral: El Robo de EEUU') donde documentaron el fraude electoral durante los últimos 25 años, especialmente desde el uso de las máquinas electrónicas de votación.
Sin embargo, los historiadores nos hacen remontar a los años 1844, 1876, 1880, 1884 etc. para establecer paralelismos de las irregularidades electorales con las de ahora.
En 1876, por ejemplo, el candidato Samuel J. Tiden derrotó en el voto popular al republicano Rutherford B. Hayes, pero perdió las elecciones por un voto en el colegio electoral conseguido a la fuerza en Florida.
Los norteamericanos posiblemente ya se olvidaron cómo en 1960 el legendario alcalde de Chicago, Richard J. Daley, había manipulado los resultados electorales en Illinois otorgando la victoria final a John F. Kennedy por 8.858 votos sobre Richard Nixon.
El periodista Ricardo Martínez de Rituerto escribió en el 2000 que "la carrera electoral de Kennedy y Nixon se resolvió en un final de 'foto finish' en el que votaron desde muertos a transeúntes y hasta ciudadanos con cuatro piernas: el elector era acompañado al secreto de la cabina electoral y el mentor se aseguraba de que votaba lo que debía…"
En el libro 'American Pharaoh', escrito por Adam Cohen y Elizabeth Taylor, un testigo cuenta cómo aquel 8 de noviembre alguien llegó a un colegio electoral y dijo: "Necesitamos 30 votos más".
La práctica de 'robarse' las elecciones se había repetido en todos los niveles: local, estatal, federal. Un caso notable tuvo lugar en el condado de Miami Dade en 1998, donde una investigación permitió que Joe Carollo ocupara la Alcaldía, cuando supuestamente había perdido las elecciones debido al voto ausente.
En el libro, 'The Best Democracy Money Can Buy', el periodista de la BBC Greg Palast explicó los procedimientos del fraude en Florida en las elecciones presidenciales en el 2000. El estado de Florida contrató a la empresa DBT por cuatro millones de dólares para que eliminara de la lista electoral a los criminales inhabilitados para votar.
La DBT presentó una lista de 94.000 personas, la mayoría afroamericanos y demócratas. Sin embargo, posteriormente se descubrió que 91.000 eran completamente inocentes. También la Secretaría de Florida informó posteriormente que entre los electores del Estado había 59.019 encarcelados, 17.000 fallecidos y 27.000 personas que habían votado más de una vez. Ya era tarde, pues George W. Bush superó al candidato demócrata Al Gore por 537 votos que dieron la victoria final al Partido Republicano. El fraude había sido consumado.
Tampoco todo había sido limpio en las elecciones presidenciales de Barack Obama en 2008, según los observadores republicanos y la investigación realizada por la CNN. Resulta que el candidato Obama recibió el apoyo de la Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN), que funciona en 100 ciudades en EEUU y tiene unos 500.000 miembros dedicados al apoyo a los más necesitados. Los investigadores llegaron a la conclusión que ACORN registró a miles de personas para que votasen por Obama, muchos de cuales estaban muertos, no existían o tenían una dirección falsa.
En un reciente artículo el ex subsecretario del Tesoro de la administración Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts afirmó (A), refiriéndose a las denuncias del candidato presidencial republicano, Donald Trump, sobre las 'encuestas falsas' y sobre el 'fraude electoral' para el próximo 8 de noviembre, que "las elecciones fraudulentas son una tradición norteamericana".
La historia electoral del país está llena de millones de muertos que participan en las elecciones, de otros millones que votan más de una vez o cuyos datos son inexactos o incorrectos. Y ni que decir tiene, los frecuentes robos de votos, coacciones, existencia de papeletas confusas o 'errores programados' en las máquinas electrónicas de votación.
Los hermanos James y Kenneth Collier, publicaron en 1992 el libro, 'Votescam: The Stealing of America' ('Estafa Electoral: El Robo de EEUU') donde documentaron el fraude electoral durante los últimos 25 años, especialmente desde el uso de las máquinas electrónicas de votación.
Sin embargo, los historiadores nos hacen remontar a los años 1844, 1876, 1880, 1884 etc. para establecer paralelismos de las irregularidades electorales con las de ahora.
En 1876, por ejemplo, el candidato Samuel J. Tiden derrotó en el voto popular al republicano Rutherford B. Hayes, pero perdió las elecciones por un voto en el colegio electoral conseguido a la fuerza en Florida.
Los norteamericanos posiblemente ya se olvidaron cómo en 1960 el legendario alcalde de Chicago, Richard J. Daley, había manipulado los resultados electorales en Illinois otorgando la victoria final a John F. Kennedy por 8.858 votos sobre Richard Nixon.
El periodista Ricardo Martínez de Rituerto escribió en el 2000 que "la carrera electoral de Kennedy y Nixon se resolvió en un final de 'foto finish' en el que votaron desde muertos a transeúntes y hasta ciudadanos con cuatro piernas: el elector era acompañado al secreto de la cabina electoral y el mentor se aseguraba de que votaba lo que debía…"
En el libro 'American Pharaoh', escrito por Adam Cohen y Elizabeth Taylor, un testigo cuenta cómo aquel 8 de noviembre alguien llegó a un colegio electoral y dijo: "Necesitamos 30 votos más".
La práctica de 'robarse' las elecciones se había repetido en todos los niveles: local, estatal, federal. Un caso notable tuvo lugar en el condado de Miami Dade en 1998, donde una investigación permitió que Joe Carollo ocupara la Alcaldía, cuando supuestamente había perdido las elecciones debido al voto ausente.
En el libro, 'The Best Democracy Money Can Buy', el periodista de la BBC Greg Palast explicó los procedimientos del fraude en Florida en las elecciones presidenciales en el 2000. El estado de Florida contrató a la empresa DBT por cuatro millones de dólares para que eliminara de la lista electoral a los criminales inhabilitados para votar.
La DBT presentó una lista de 94.000 personas, la mayoría afroamericanos y demócratas. Sin embargo, posteriormente se descubrió que 91.000 eran completamente inocentes. También la Secretaría de Florida informó posteriormente que entre los electores del Estado había 59.019 encarcelados, 17.000 fallecidos y 27.000 personas que habían votado más de una vez. Ya era tarde, pues George W. Bush superó al candidato demócrata Al Gore por 537 votos que dieron la victoria final al Partido Republicano. El fraude había sido consumado.
Tampoco todo había sido limpio en las elecciones presidenciales de Barack Obama en 2008, según los observadores republicanos y la investigación realizada por la CNN. Resulta que el candidato Obama recibió el apoyo de la Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN), que funciona en 100 ciudades en EEUU y tiene unos 500.000 miembros dedicados al apoyo a los más necesitados. Los investigadores llegaron a la conclusión que ACORN registró a miles de personas para que votasen por Obama, muchos de cuales estaban muertos, no existían o tenían una dirección falsa.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
(A)
October 24, 2016
Election Potpourri
The Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen
Paul Craig Roberts
Over the course of its history, the New York Times has reported on many American elections that have been rigged or stolen or are suspected of having been being rigged or stolen.
For example, as a supporter of the black civil rights movement, the NY Times has many stories in its archives of elections rigged by disenfranchisement of black voters.
But this was when the NY Times was an independent voice before it became a whore for the Oligarchs who rule America.
When the NY Times reported that black Americans could have no confidence in the integrity of American elections, the NY Times did not denounce itself for delegitimizing American democracy.
The NY Times forgot all of this when it published Max Fisher’s article yesterday. Fisher fished up “scholars” among the Hillary advocates, and they obligingly told him that Trump’s questioning of the integrity of American elections were the tactics of a would-be dictator who is at work delegitimizing democracy so that he can take over.
What Fisher and his “scholars” overlook is that the US government is already delegitimized in the eyes of the American population, as well as foreign populations.
If the US government was not already delegitimized, Donald Trump would not have been successful in what, despite Trump’s damnation by the presstitutes, was an easy sweep-aside of the Establishment’s candidates for the Republican presidential nomination.
The US government is delegitimized, not only in the eyes of Americans, but also in the eyes of most of the world.
Millions of Americans have lost their jobs, their careers, their hopes, because corrupt bought-and-paid-for-Washington enabled Globalism to send the futures of the American people to China and India.
Millions of Americans lost their homes, because the corrupt Federal Reserve came down on the side of five “banks too big to fail” at the expense of the American people.
Millions of Americans along with much of the world know that the US government has been slaughtering millions of peoples in seven countries based on lies, wasting not only countries and the lives of millions of peoples, but trillions of American dollars that Americans needed for their welfare.
Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Assad did not use chemical weapons. Gaddafi was innocent of all the absurd charges that Washington used to destroy Libya, a country that had the most progressive social system on earth. Russia did not invade Ukraine. The Taliban had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Yet countries are in ruins because of Washington’s war crimes justified by transparent lies.
If the NY Times does not know this, the organization is too stupid to justify its existence.
Of course the Times knows it. But the NY Times is no longer a newspaper. It is a cog in the Ministry of Propaganda that works to create a Matrix in which brainwashed Americans accept the dictates of the Oligarchs.
The purpose of the Times’ article is to discredit in advance criticism of an election that the ruling Oligarchs intend to steal.
If the Times believed that Hillary would have a clear election victory, there would be no point to Fisher’s article.
We see voluminous signs of the intended theft of the election. For example, Hillary’s lead in the polls is based on the pollsters skewing the affiliation of those polled to Democrats.
The percentage of Democrats in the samples is far higher than their percentage of registered voters. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/how-wapos-latest-poll-give-hillary-12-point-advantage-over-trump
It the past it was difficult to steal elections unless they were very close. Exit polls were a check on vote count, and the disenfranchisement of blacks could be risky if it attracted the attention of the US Department of Justice.
The new method, which is unfolding before our eyes, steals the election in advance with the Oligarchs’ candidate far ahead in the polls (now by 12 points according to the latest fiction) and by making anyone who questions the faked results into a fascist dictator.
Obviously, if Hillary was really ahead by 12 points — a landslide — there would be no need for Fisher’s article or for the constant drumbeat against Trump.
Judging from the hysteria, as reflected in Fisher’s NY Times article, for example, the Oligarchs are aware that objections to their rule have elevated Trump. In order to hold on to power, the American Oligarchs must smash Trump and put their bought-and-paid-for-candidate, Hillary — whom the Oligarchs have provided along with Bill a personal fortune of $120 million and endowed the Clinton Foundation with $1,600 million — into the Oval Office.
Pollsters by nature of their business are unreliable. If truthful results offend the establishment political organizations, the pollsters are out of work. Polls have to serve the Oligarchs or the polling firms go down. Trump is an outsider toward whom the ruling Oligarchy is totally opposed, which is why Americans support him. Therefore, polling firms are adverse to betting their future on poll results favorable to Trump, especially when the whores who constitute the American print and TV media, such as the NY Times, are all out to put Hillary in the White House.
As Hillary’s public statements have made clear, Hillary is antagonistic toward Russia and the Russian government, calling the president of Russia “the new Hitler.”
She promises conflict with Russia, which would certainly be nuclear and end life on earth.
Trump says in the face of contrary ruling neoconservative opinion that he sees no point in conflict with Russia and no point in NATO’s continued existence a quarter century after the purpose of NATO collapsed with the Soviet Union.
Trump might not be successful in appointing a government that serves his instincts, but at least he gives us hope of avoiding military conflict with Russia and China. With Hillary there is no hope whatsoever. My opinion is that the world would not survive Hillary’s first term. I have known the neoconservatives since the 1970s.
They are crazed fanatics, and they hate Russia. Hillary is their agent.
It is unclear that the Russian government understands, or takes seriously, the neoconservative ideology of US world hegemony.
Putin’s hesitant, indecisive behavior in Syria has done more to set himself and Russia up for demonization than to defeat ISIS.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/10/24/by-cooperating-with-washington-on-syria-russia-walked-into-a-trap-paul-craig-roberts/
The Western world is corrupt and evil.
The list of its victims is almost endless.
What disconnect makes some Russians desire association with the Western world?
How the Media and Democrats Rig the Perception of Trump
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/18/undercover-video-shows-democrats-saying-they-hire-/
The Orchestrated Trump-Putin Connection
Leaked emails prove that the Trump-Putin connection was orhestrated as campaign talk
to deflect attention from damaging content of Clinton’s released emails.
https://www.rt.com/usa/363779-clinton-trump-putin-isis/
Integrity Of US Elections Among Lowest Of All Countries
According to Shyla Nelson, the co-founder of Election Justice USA, US elections are manipulated in many ways, including «voter suppression, unauthorized registration purges, district gerrymandering, gross exit poll variances, the privatization of voting machinery, and the lack of transparency in ballot processing – our elections will continue to rank among the lowest in the world in integrity.
US elections are so corrupt that the US has threatened Russian diplomats with arrest if they attempt to monitor the US November presidential election.
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/10/23/us-gives-another-reason-believe-democracy-deeply-flawed.html
Bill Clinton’s Rape Victims (the ones we know about)
http://www.albertpeia.com/oxfordassault.htm
But we must not tolerate Trump’s lewd comments.
Bill and Hillary are lawless because they have never been held accountable. As the justice system has given Hillary a pass, will voters hold her accountable in November, or will the American public also give her a pass?
Hillary Has Never Been Held Accountable For Anything
What is worse, Hillary laughing about her success in getting a child rapist off or Trump’s lewd comments about women? Why is it that the TV women can’t come up with the right answer? How can democracy function when a propaganda ministry takes the place of the media?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2658801/I-never-trusted-polygraph-Hillary-Clinton-LAUGHS-recalls-helped-suspected-child-rapist-walk-free-prosecution-lost-crucial-evidence.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html
A Comparison of Trump’s and Hillary’s Crowds
Trump’s crowds are hundreds of times larger than Hillary’s, so how is it that she is
in the lead? We are being told lies in order to cover up the coming election theft.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4K56KaJ7Ds&app=desktop
Poll of Likely Voters Finds 53% Want Hillary Indicted
If 53% of voters want Hillary indicted, how can she be leading in the presidential race?
Which of the polls is wrong?
https://www.rt.com/usa/363759-hillary-emails-indicted-poll/
Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/10/21/rigged-elections-are-an-american-tradition-paul-craig-roberts/
Stephen Lendman pleads: don’t let them steal the election, reject the presstitutes’ propaganda:
November 8 isn’t election day. It’s orchestrated grand theft theater to anoint Hillary Obama’s successor. Americans are deluded to believe their vote matters.
This year’s outcome was decided well in advance, likely last year before aspirants announced their candidacy for the nation’s highest office.
Power brokers running America bear full responsibility for concocting a sham system, fantasy democracy, not the real thing.
Disgracefully one-sided pro-Hillary media scoundrels and corporate pollsters share blame for creating the impression of her unbeatability.
Press agent journalism proliferates. Biased corporate polls are easily manipulated to show what sponsors want. On Sunday, The New York Times virtually declared Hillary November’s winner and next president, saying she “has a 93% chance to win.”
The dirty game aims to discourage Trump supporters, convince them he has no chance to win, hoping many will stay home, while encouraging rank and file for Hillary to show up en masse.
Any number of dirty tricks can be used to assure she’s anointed president-elect. Stolen elections are a longstanding US tradition from the early days of the republic.
Now it’s done by methods explained above, electronic ease, voter roll stripping and other dirty tricks.
Paul Craig Roberts explains turnout for Trump stump speeches overwhelming exceeds what Hillary attracts.
So how come most polls show her leading, he asks? “We are being told lies in order to cover up the coming election theft,” he justifiably explains.
Want more evidence? Here it is. Citing an October 18 – 19, Rasmussen poll, RT International reported 65% of voters surveyed saying Hillary acted extrajudicially by storing classified State Department emails on her private server.
A 53% majority believe she should be indicted. When asked if Hillary’s email scandal was important in influencing their vote, 70% replied affirmatively – 49% calling it very important.
If Hillary wins as expected, around 70% of Republican voters believe it’s by election-rigging, according to a separate Reuters/Ipsos poll RT cited.
If most voters want her indicted, polls showing her leading Trump lack credibility.
She’s the establishment candidate, Wall Street’s choice, Trump an outlier, relentlessly denigrated, things rigged to assure he loses.
Democracy in America serves its privileged few alone — indifferent to the needs, rights and welfare of most others, especially the nation’s poor and vulnerable.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Election Potpourri
The Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen
Paul Craig Roberts
Over the course of its history, the New York Times has reported on many American elections that have been rigged or stolen or are suspected of having been being rigged or stolen.
For example, as a supporter of the black civil rights movement, the NY Times has many stories in its archives of elections rigged by disenfranchisement of black voters.
But this was when the NY Times was an independent voice before it became a whore for the Oligarchs who rule America.
When the NY Times reported that black Americans could have no confidence in the integrity of American elections, the NY Times did not denounce itself for delegitimizing American democracy.
The NY Times forgot all of this when it published Max Fisher’s article yesterday. Fisher fished up “scholars” among the Hillary advocates, and they obligingly told him that Trump’s questioning of the integrity of American elections were the tactics of a would-be dictator who is at work delegitimizing democracy so that he can take over.
What Fisher and his “scholars” overlook is that the US government is already delegitimized in the eyes of the American population, as well as foreign populations.
If the US government was not already delegitimized, Donald Trump would not have been successful in what, despite Trump’s damnation by the presstitutes, was an easy sweep-aside of the Establishment’s candidates for the Republican presidential nomination.
The US government is delegitimized, not only in the eyes of Americans, but also in the eyes of most of the world.
Millions of Americans have lost their jobs, their careers, their hopes, because corrupt bought-and-paid-for-Washington enabled Globalism to send the futures of the American people to China and India.
Millions of Americans lost their homes, because the corrupt Federal Reserve came down on the side of five “banks too big to fail” at the expense of the American people.
Millions of Americans along with much of the world know that the US government has been slaughtering millions of peoples in seven countries based on lies, wasting not only countries and the lives of millions of peoples, but trillions of American dollars that Americans needed for their welfare.
Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Assad did not use chemical weapons. Gaddafi was innocent of all the absurd charges that Washington used to destroy Libya, a country that had the most progressive social system on earth. Russia did not invade Ukraine. The Taliban had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Yet countries are in ruins because of Washington’s war crimes justified by transparent lies.
If the NY Times does not know this, the organization is too stupid to justify its existence.
Of course the Times knows it. But the NY Times is no longer a newspaper. It is a cog in the Ministry of Propaganda that works to create a Matrix in which brainwashed Americans accept the dictates of the Oligarchs.
The purpose of the Times’ article is to discredit in advance criticism of an election that the ruling Oligarchs intend to steal.
If the Times believed that Hillary would have a clear election victory, there would be no point to Fisher’s article.
We see voluminous signs of the intended theft of the election. For example, Hillary’s lead in the polls is based on the pollsters skewing the affiliation of those polled to Democrats.
The percentage of Democrats in the samples is far higher than their percentage of registered voters. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/how-wapos-latest-poll-give-hillary-12-point-advantage-over-trump
It the past it was difficult to steal elections unless they were very close. Exit polls were a check on vote count, and the disenfranchisement of blacks could be risky if it attracted the attention of the US Department of Justice.
The new method, which is unfolding before our eyes, steals the election in advance with the Oligarchs’ candidate far ahead in the polls (now by 12 points according to the latest fiction) and by making anyone who questions the faked results into a fascist dictator.
Obviously, if Hillary was really ahead by 12 points — a landslide — there would be no need for Fisher’s article or for the constant drumbeat against Trump.
Judging from the hysteria, as reflected in Fisher’s NY Times article, for example, the Oligarchs are aware that objections to their rule have elevated Trump. In order to hold on to power, the American Oligarchs must smash Trump and put their bought-and-paid-for-candidate, Hillary — whom the Oligarchs have provided along with Bill a personal fortune of $120 million and endowed the Clinton Foundation with $1,600 million — into the Oval Office.
Pollsters by nature of their business are unreliable. If truthful results offend the establishment political organizations, the pollsters are out of work. Polls have to serve the Oligarchs or the polling firms go down. Trump is an outsider toward whom the ruling Oligarchy is totally opposed, which is why Americans support him. Therefore, polling firms are adverse to betting their future on poll results favorable to Trump, especially when the whores who constitute the American print and TV media, such as the NY Times, are all out to put Hillary in the White House.
As Hillary’s public statements have made clear, Hillary is antagonistic toward Russia and the Russian government, calling the president of Russia “the new Hitler.”
She promises conflict with Russia, which would certainly be nuclear and end life on earth.
Trump says in the face of contrary ruling neoconservative opinion that he sees no point in conflict with Russia and no point in NATO’s continued existence a quarter century after the purpose of NATO collapsed with the Soviet Union.
Trump might not be successful in appointing a government that serves his instincts, but at least he gives us hope of avoiding military conflict with Russia and China. With Hillary there is no hope whatsoever. My opinion is that the world would not survive Hillary’s first term. I have known the neoconservatives since the 1970s.
They are crazed fanatics, and they hate Russia. Hillary is their agent.
It is unclear that the Russian government understands, or takes seriously, the neoconservative ideology of US world hegemony.
Putin’s hesitant, indecisive behavior in Syria has done more to set himself and Russia up for demonization than to defeat ISIS.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/10/24/by-cooperating-with-washington-on-syria-russia-walked-into-a-trap-paul-craig-roberts/
The Western world is corrupt and evil.
The list of its victims is almost endless.
What disconnect makes some Russians desire association with the Western world?
How the Media and Democrats Rig the Perception of Trump
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/18/undercover-video-shows-democrats-saying-they-hire-/
The Orchestrated Trump-Putin Connection
Leaked emails prove that the Trump-Putin connection was orhestrated as campaign talk
to deflect attention from damaging content of Clinton’s released emails.
https://www.rt.com/usa/363779-clinton-trump-putin-isis/
Integrity Of US Elections Among Lowest Of All Countries
According to Shyla Nelson, the co-founder of Election Justice USA, US elections are manipulated in many ways, including «voter suppression, unauthorized registration purges, district gerrymandering, gross exit poll variances, the privatization of voting machinery, and the lack of transparency in ballot processing – our elections will continue to rank among the lowest in the world in integrity.
US elections are so corrupt that the US has threatened Russian diplomats with arrest if they attempt to monitor the US November presidential election.
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/10/23/us-gives-another-reason-believe-democracy-deeply-flawed.html
Bill Clinton’s Rape Victims (the ones we know about)
http://www.albertpeia.com/oxfordassault.htm
But we must not tolerate Trump’s lewd comments.
Bill and Hillary are lawless because they have never been held accountable. As the justice system has given Hillary a pass, will voters hold her accountable in November, or will the American public also give her a pass?
Hillary Has Never Been Held Accountable For Anything
What is worse, Hillary laughing about her success in getting a child rapist off or Trump’s lewd comments about women? Why is it that the TV women can’t come up with the right answer? How can democracy function when a propaganda ministry takes the place of the media?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2658801/I-never-trusted-polygraph-Hillary-Clinton-LAUGHS-recalls-helped-suspected-child-rapist-walk-free-prosecution-lost-crucial-evidence.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html
A Comparison of Trump’s and Hillary’s Crowds
Trump’s crowds are hundreds of times larger than Hillary’s, so how is it that she is
in the lead? We are being told lies in order to cover up the coming election theft.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4K56KaJ7Ds&app=desktop
Poll of Likely Voters Finds 53% Want Hillary Indicted
If 53% of voters want Hillary indicted, how can she be leading in the presidential race?
Which of the polls is wrong?
https://www.rt.com/usa/363759-hillary-emails-indicted-poll/
Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/10/21/rigged-elections-are-an-american-tradition-paul-craig-roberts/
Stephen Lendman pleads: don’t let them steal the election, reject the presstitutes’ propaganda:
November 8 isn’t election day. It’s orchestrated grand theft theater to anoint Hillary Obama’s successor. Americans are deluded to believe their vote matters.
This year’s outcome was decided well in advance, likely last year before aspirants announced their candidacy for the nation’s highest office.
Power brokers running America bear full responsibility for concocting a sham system, fantasy democracy, not the real thing.
Disgracefully one-sided pro-Hillary media scoundrels and corporate pollsters share blame for creating the impression of her unbeatability.
Press agent journalism proliferates. Biased corporate polls are easily manipulated to show what sponsors want. On Sunday, The New York Times virtually declared Hillary November’s winner and next president, saying she “has a 93% chance to win.”
The dirty game aims to discourage Trump supporters, convince them he has no chance to win, hoping many will stay home, while encouraging rank and file for Hillary to show up en masse.
Any number of dirty tricks can be used to assure she’s anointed president-elect. Stolen elections are a longstanding US tradition from the early days of the republic.
Now it’s done by methods explained above, electronic ease, voter roll stripping and other dirty tricks.
Paul Craig Roberts explains turnout for Trump stump speeches overwhelming exceeds what Hillary attracts.
So how come most polls show her leading, he asks? “We are being told lies in order to cover up the coming election theft,” he justifiably explains.
Want more evidence? Here it is. Citing an October 18 – 19, Rasmussen poll, RT International reported 65% of voters surveyed saying Hillary acted extrajudicially by storing classified State Department emails on her private server.
A 53% majority believe she should be indicted. When asked if Hillary’s email scandal was important in influencing their vote, 70% replied affirmatively – 49% calling it very important.
If Hillary wins as expected, around 70% of Republican voters believe it’s by election-rigging, according to a separate Reuters/Ipsos poll RT cited.
If most voters want her indicted, polls showing her leading Trump lack credibility.
She’s the establishment candidate, Wall Street’s choice, Trump an outlier, relentlessly denigrated, things rigged to assure he loses.
Democracy in America serves its privileged few alone — indifferent to the needs, rights and welfare of most others, especially the nation’s poor and vulnerable.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
