Sunday, November 27, 2011



About UFOs and Nuclear Weapons

Although most people are completely unaware of its existence, the UFO-Nukes Connection is now remarkably well-documented. U.S. Air Force, FBI, and CIA files declassified via the Freedom of Information Act establish a convincing, ongoing pattern of UFO activity at American nuclear weapons sites extending back to December 1948.

Moreover, these mysterious incursions are not ancient history, so to speak, occurring only during the Cold War era. Indeed, evidence suggests that multiple, ongoing incidents have taken place near ICBM sites operated by F.E. Warren Air Force Base, in Wyoming, as recently as June 2011.

For nearly 40 years, noted researcher Robert Hastings has sought out and interviewed former and retired U.S. Air Force personnel regarding their direct or indirect involvement in nuclear weapons-related UFO incidents. 

These individuals—ranging from retired colonels to former airmen—report extraordinary encounters which have obvious national security implications. In fact, taken to their logical conclusion, these cases have planetary implications, given the horrific consequences that would result from a full-scale, global nuclear war.

Significantly, the UFO activity occasionally transcends mere surveillance and involves direct and unambiguous interference with our strategic weapons systems. Numerous cases include reports of mysterious malfunctions of large numbers of nuclear missiles just as one or more UFOs hovered nearby. (Declassified KGB documents confirm that such incidents also occurred in the former Soviet Union.)

To date, Hastings has interviewed over 120 military veterans who were involved in various UFO-related incidents at U.S. missile sites, weapons storage facilities, and nuclear bomb test ranges. The events described by these individuals leave little doubt that the U.S. nuclear weapons program is an ongoing source of interest to someone possessing vastly superior technology.

On September 27, 2010 Hastings hosted the UFO-Nukes Connection press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C., during which seven U.S. Air Force veterans discussed UFO incursions at nuclear weapons sites during the Cold War era. CNN streamed that event live; the full-length video is below:

The witnesses said that they felt compelled to speak out about the reality of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites and urged the U.S. government to finally reveal the facts to the American people and the rest of the world.

Since 1981, Hastings has presented his research findings at more than 500 colleges and universities nationwide, and possesses hundreds of highly favorable letters of recommendation from sponsors. "I am not condemning any government agency for its policy of secrecy regarding UFOs", says Hastings, "but I believe that the public should be given the facts."

Hastings believes that UFOs are piloted by visitors from elsewhere in the universe who, for whatever reason, have taken an interest in our long-term survival. 

He contends that these beings are occasionally disrupting our nukes to send a message to the American and Soviet/Russian governments that their possession and potential large-scale use of nuclear weapons threatens the future of humanity and the environmental integrity of the planet. 

In short, Washington and Moscow are being warned that they are "playing with fire." To suggest that this scenario is the only explanation for widespread UFO sightings during the modern era would be presumptuous, simplistic, and undoubtedly inaccurate. Nevertheless, Hastings believes that the now well-documented nuclear weapons-related incidents are integral to an understanding of the mystery that confronts us.
 Sometimes reality is indeed stranger than fiction.

website by zijn-digital


Estamos delante de una de las noticias mas importantes
de la entera Historia de la humanidad.

Y, sin embargo, pocos, seriamente, la conocen.
Algo que dice mas sobre el 'homo sapiens'
que sobre nuestros misteriosos visitantes.

En el video los testigos hablan claro y con credibilidad.

Múltiples apariciones de OVNI's,
sobre los silos de misiles nucleares,
que a veces desarticulan las computadoras.

Los militares expertos y profesionales que describen 
los hechos son tajantes en su verosimilitud:
objetos desconocidos aparecen en los lugares más estratégicamente transcendentales de los Estados Unidos,
Rusia, y otros países: sus silos de misiles.

Todo son preguntas.

--¿Nos trantan de comunicar algo?
--¿Qué mensaje nos quieren pasar?
--¿Es nada mas que una 'atracción' que detecta el OVNI
   sobre esos silos?
--¿Es un decirnos "parar esta locura-suicida
   antes de que sea demasiado tarde"?
--¿Es un aviso premonitorio a ésta criatura humana
   con Tanta Mente y Tan De-Mente?
--¿Es simplemente curiosidad sin ningúna implicación?
--¿O es que nos vigilan "como posibles rivales de algo"?
--¿Es que empiezan a observar aqui en la Tierra
   que "algo está saliendo equivocado" y nos quieren advertir?
--¿Es una combinación de todas estas cosas?

Todo son preguntas.

Pero hay ciertas decodificaciones:
a) Poseen poder para neutralizar los sistemas electrónicos.
b) Este obvio poder no lo usan en toda su magnitud:
     los silos siguen ahi.
c)  Su plan es el de la observación, no el de la penetración
     y la interferencia.
d) Su misión es la de 'presenciar', no la de 'actuar'

Todo son preguntas.

Pero, sea lo que sea, estamos en sus manos,
en las mentes que controlan éstas manos,
o éstos cacharros.

¿Que querran?
¿A que vienen?
¿Cuáles son sus intenciones?
Estamos en sus manos.

Y la Noticia, que es una de las más importantes
de toda la Historia de la humanidad,
permanece en la caja fuerte de la 'National Security'
de los Altos Mandos Militares de las grandes potencias
que son los que realmente mandan en la tribu humana.


James Carlson said...

Robert Hastings is a liar and a fraud who shouldn't be trusted in regard to anything, including what he had for breakfast this morning. As soon as you start questioning his witnesses, you find out almost immediately that they are either not willing to establish the claims that Hastings has made for them, or have nothing to say that qualifies as valid evidence. Hastings, aware finally that his witnesses can be tracked down and reinterviewed, is now using anonymous witnesses to validate his claims. He's a fraud and a petty con-man trying to sell an idea, his book, and nothing more.

If you like, I can send you copies of multiple emails from Hastings that contain a number of absolute and easily proven lies. His conduct on and off the internet has been dishonest, highly offensive, and full of outright lies. He refuses point blank to answer any detailed questions in regard to his claims, part of the reason being the very well substantiated fact that his own witnesses in regard to those claims have, on occasion, accused him of lying, taking statements out of context, and refusing entirely to assert the claims of those witnesses, who have insisted repeatedly that no UFO was involved in that incident, no UFO was sighted, no UFO was reported, no UFO was investigated, and no UFO was ever thought to be involved by anyone in the chain of command. Even his methods for documenting the transcripts of telephone interviews have shown a deceptive streak, allowing him to hide the actual claims of such witnesses (see

When his own witnesses consider him a fraud, something is going on, and it has nothing at all to do with honesty on his part. He's even gone so far as to invent a number of medical publications and articles establishing a fictional association between epilepsy and violent mania for no other purpose then to raise the issue of credibility in reference to those who have established claims contrary to his own, and he did so without once refuting, explaining, accounting for, or, in some cases, even acknowledging the evidence presented. A man who fails to defend himself or his claims, merely attacking the credibility of his critics with disgusting insinuations and personal insults is not a man who can defend his assertions honestly. The fact that he refuses to even try is not necessarily a point in his favor.

James Carlson said...

Robert Hastings is a liar and a fraud, charges that have been proven ... repeatedly.

His promotion of Robert Salas' alleged experiences at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967 as UFO related incidents are part of his habitual reliance on lies and subterfuge. There were no UFOs involved at Echo Flight at all, and the incident at Oscar Flight never even happened, and it doesn't matter one whit what Salas and Hastings claim, because those claims are easily been proven lies. Both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967 have repeatedly come forward to state that UFOs were not involved. They also insist, as do many dozens of other witnesses who were at Malmstrom AFB on the dates in question, that the incident at Oscar Flight never even occurred; in fact, there is no record anywhere suggesting that such an incident ever took place, and there has never been an attempt to declare such an incident until Robert Salas did so nearly forty years later.

The only thing people need to understand about sources of information like Robert Salas and Robert Hastings can be summed up quickly: if you can't trust them to tell the truth, why would you listen to anything that they have to say?

I would recommend that if you are truly interested in understanding something about Salas' or Hastings' credibility, you go to the following URLs, where you can download at no cost a book and supporting articles discussing in some detail exactly how far they can be trusted:

I would also recommend that you examine the numerous interviews and articles at the Reality Uncovered website: -- many of the top articles referenced discuss the events at Echo Flight in March 1967, and include interviews with both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967 when the missiles were taken offline by an electronic noise pulse, an incident that was thoroughly investigated and very well documented, contrary to what Hastings and Salas have always insisted.

It's a sad thing indeed when the resources that so many consider to be so credible have refused to examine 90% of the evidence available, including over 80 pages of FOIA documentation, the statements repeatedly issued by the only actual witnesses at Echo Flight, the statements originating with Salas' own crew commander during the alleged incident at Oscar Flight, and the statements of literally dozens of ex-missileers regarding the supposed event at Oscar Flight, including absolute and verified proof that no equipment failures occurred anywhere on Malmstrom AFB during the same period of the Oscar Flight failures insisted upon by both Salas and Hastings.

A lot information regarding this incident can also be found at the Reality Uncovered forum, in particular the Echo Flight Incident thread:

Tim Hebert, an ex-USAF missileer himself, has also written some enlightening articles regarding the case on his blog at:

James Carlson said...

Dr. David Clarke, for many years an accepted expert regarding the British military forces' investigations of the UFO phenomenon, has also discussed this case in the context of the "UFO and Nukes" connection asserted by author Robert Hastings. You can read his article on the subject at

There is no doubt whatsoever that Hastings and Salas created this case for their own benefit. There were no UFOs involved -- it is a lie, and nothing more. This doesn't entirely negate their arguments in relation to these two events. If the witnesses both men have promoted -- Col. Walt Figel and Col. Frederick Meiwald -- actually told them what Hastings and Salas say they told them, it should be very easy to simply ask them to do so again, except write it down in a statement instead of using transcripts of telephone calls that both men have already and repeatedly refuted. This is a standard confirmatory process that Robert Hastings in particular has been extremely willing to establish with other witnesses. So why does he refuse to even discuss the matter where the Echo Flight witnesses are concerned? A written statement of the events that occurred and a willingness to respond to a very few clarifying questions immediately afterward is a time-honored test of one's confirmation of an act or incident. It's almost as if Hastings is afraid that a written statement will indeed call atention to his numerous flaws as an honest investigator of UFO phenomena.

These men are still alive, and I have already ascertained that they are willing to respond to enquiry regarding the events they participated in. I have, in fact, provided exactly that in regard to these silly UFO assertions. Given these points, why have Robert Salas and Robert Hastings refused to obtain from them a single, cohesive statement that resolves very plainly the questions asked, making clear those points they have been trying to establish for over 15 years? I would think that such an easy opportunity to not only establish their claims, but establish as well the honesty of their accounts and the honesty of the witnesses they have presented would be eagerly approached by someone who is actually telling the truth. Instead they've ignored every opportunity to establish their insistent assertions, and correct whatever doubts have been applied to the substance of their accounts.

The bottom line regarding their assertions is simple: they cannot be trusted to tell the truth, so why would anybody believe anything at all that they have to say? Both men have proven themselves to be dishonest, so any information regarding this issue that they are being paid to discuss should not be trusted. These men have told numerous lies to support their claims, and that should be taken into consideration whenever they present such doubtful claims as those they have repeatedly consigned to the public trough. In light of this, it isn't even necessary to examine other cases that have originated with either man; if they have proven themselves to be unreliable and dishonest sources of information in one case, all other cases they've defined should be rejected in turn. Of course, this doesn't concern any cases that have not originated with Hastings or Salas, and should not be applied to them. The doubt originates with their ethics and honesty, and can't be applied to cases that have originated elsewhere.

Thank you,
James Carlson
Albuquerque, NM

Ad Humanitatem said...

The only syllogistic way
--dialectical logic included--
that I have to think about this sensitive issue involving the 'National Security' --in this case, the USA--, is the Axioma that make me to believe that, in the event that all this were true --and, therefore, Robert Hastings is not a liar-- ...the government of the USA would do everything in his power to deny it, of course.
...An you also deny it.

Besides, the documents on the case --U.S. Air Force, FBI, and CIA files declassified via the Freedom of Information Acta-- are also false?

Also, inherently there is a basis of common sense in this whole affair:
It is Obvious that Unidentified Objects are visiting us almost constantly, and with a technology far superior to ours, is not entirely plausible --for the UFO's-- to approach the nuclear silos because these places are one the most representative of our current technology?

Blog Archive