Friday, July 20, 2012
USA: The Great Transformation: From the Welfare State to the Imperial Police State
VOZ DE ALARMA:
"The Great Transformation: From the Welfare State to the Imperial Police  State" 
James Petras Introduction: The United States has  experienced the biggest political upheaval in its recent history: the  transformation of a burgeoning welfare state into a rapidly expanding, highly  intrusive and deeply entrenched police state, linked to the most developed  technological innovations.
The ‘Great Transformation’ occurred exclusively from above, organized  by the upper echelons of the civil and military bureaucracy under the direction  of the Executive and his National Security Council. 
The ‘Great Transformation’  was not a single event but a process of the accumulation of  powers, via executive fiats, supported and approved by compliant  Congressional leaders. At no time in the recent and distant past has this nation  witnessed the growth of such repressive powers and the proliferation of so many  policing agencies engaged in so many areas of life over such a prolonged period  of time (a time of virtually no internal mass dissent). 
Never has the executive  branch of government secured so many powers to detain, interrogate, kidnap and  assassinate its own citizens without judicial restraint.
Police state dominance is evident in the enormous growth of the domestic  security and military budget, the vast recruitment of security and military  personnel, the accumulation of authoritarian powers curtailing individual and  collective freedoms and the permeation of national cultural and civic life with  the almost religious glorification of the agents and agencies of militarism and  the police state as evidenced at mass sporting and entertainment events.
The drying up of resources for public welfare and services is a direct result  of the dynamic growth of the police state apparatus and military empire. This  could only take place through a sustained direct attack against the welfare  state – in particular against public funding for programs and agencies promoting  the health, education, pensions, income and housing for the middle and working  class.
The Ascendancy of the Police State
Central to the rise of the police state and the consequent decline of the  welfare state have been the series of imperial wars, especially in the  Middle East, launched by every President from Bush (father), Clinton, Bush (son)  and Obama. These wars, aimed exclusively against Muslim countries, were  accompanied by a wave of repressive ‘anti-terrorist’ laws and implemented  through the rapid build-up of the massive police state apparatus, known as  ‘Homeland Security’. 
The leading advocates and propagandists of overseas militarism against  countries with large Muslim populations and the imposition of a domestic  police-state have been dedicated Zionists promoting wars designed to enhance  Israel’s overwhelming power in the Middle East. These American Zionists  (including dual US-Israeli citizens) secured strategic positions within  the US police state apparatus in order to terrify and repress activists,  especially American Muslims and immigrants critical of the state of Israel.
The events of 9/11//01 served as the detonator for the biggest global  military launch since WWII, and the most pervasive expansion of police state  powers in the history of the United States. The bloody terror of 9/11/2001 was  manipulated to institute a pre-planned agenda – transforming the US into a  police state while launching a decade- long series of wars in Iraq, Afghanistan,  Pakistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and, now, Syria as well as covert proxy wars  against Iran and Lebanon. 
The military budget exploded and government deficits  ballooned while social programs and welfare were denigrated and dismantled as  the ‘Global War on Terror’ swung into full gear. Programs, designed to maintain  or raise living standards for millions and increase access to services for the  poor and working class, fell victim to ‘9/11’. 
As the wars in the Middle East took center-stage, the US economy tanked. On  the domestic front vital public investment in education, infrastructure,  industry and civilian innovations were slashed. Hundreds of billions of tax  payer dollars flowed into the war zones, paying mercenaries (private  contractors), buying off corrupt puppet regimes and providing a golden  opportunity for military procurement officers and their private  contractor-cronies to run up (and pocket) huge billion dollar cost overruns.
As a result, US military policy vis a vis the Middle East, military policy,  which at one time had been designed to promote American imperial economic  interests, now took on a life of its own: wars and sanctions against Iraq, Iran,  Syria and Libya had undermined profitable oil contracts negotiated by US  multi-nationals while enhancing militarism. Indeed, the Zionist-Israeli power  configuration in the United States has become far more influential in directing  US Middle East military policy than any combination of Big Oil – and all to the  benefit of Israeli regional power.
Imperial Wars and the Demise of the Welfare State
From the end of World War II to the end of the 1970’s, the US managed to  successfully combine overseas imperial wars with an expanding welfare state at  home. In fact, the last major pieces of welfare legislation took place  during the bloody, costly US-Indo-Chinese war, under Presidents Lyndon Johnson  and Richard Nixon. The economic basis of welfare-militarism was the powerful  industrial-technological foundations of the US war-machine and its dominance  over world markets. Subsequently, the declining competitive position of the US  in the world-economy and the massive relocation of US-MNC (and their jobs)  overseas strained the ‘marriage’ of domestic welfare and militarism to the  breaking point. 
Fiscal and trade deficits loomed even as the demands for welfare  and unemployment payments grew in part because of the shift from stable  well-paid manufacturing jobs to low paid-service work. While the global US  economic position declined, its global military expansion accelerated as a  result of the demise of the Communist regimes in the USSR and Eastern Europe and  the incorporation of the new regimes of the former Eastern bloc into the  US-dominated NATO military alliance.
The demise of the Communist states led to the end of competing global welfare  systems and allowed capitalists and the imperial state to slash welfare to fund  their massive global military expansion. There was virtually no opposition from  labor: the gradual conversion of Western trade unions into highly authoritarian  organizations run by self-perpetuating millionaire ‘leaders’ and the reduction  of trade union membership from 30% of the work force in 1950 to less than 11% by  2012 (with over 91% of private sector workers without any representation) meant  that American workers have been powerless to organize strikes to protect their  jobs, let alone apply political pressure in defense of public programs and  welfare.
Militarism was on the ascendency when President Jimmy Carter launched his  multi-billion dollar ‘secret war’ against the pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan  and President Ronald Reagan initiated a series of ‘proxy wars’ throughout  Central America and Southern Africa and sent the US Marines into the tiny island  of Grenada. 
Reagan oversaw the escalation of military spending boasting that he  would ‘bankrupt’ the Soviet Union with a new ‘arms race’. President George Bush,  Sr. invaded Panama and then Iraq, the first of many US invasions in the Middle  East. President Bill Clinton accelerated the military thrust, along the way  slashing public welfare in favor of ‘private workfare’, bombing and destroying  Yugoslavia, bombing and starving Iraq while establishing colonial enclaves in  Northern Iraq and expanding the US military presence in Somalia and the Persian  Gulf.
The constraints on US militarism imposed by the massive popular anti-Vietnam  War movement and the US military defeat by the Vietnamese Communists, were  gradually eroded, as successful short term wars (like Grenada and Panama)  undermined the Vietnam Syndrome –public opposition to militarism. 
This prepared  the American public for incremental militarism while chipping away at the  welfare system.
If Reagan and Bush built the foundation for the new militarism, Bill Clinton  provided three decisive elements: together with Vice-President Al Gore, Clinton  legitimized the war on welfarism, stigmatizing public assistance and mobilized  support from religious and political leaders in the black community and the  AFL-CIO.  
Secondly, Clinton was key to the ‘financialization’ of the US economy,  by de-regulating the financial system (repealing the Glass-Steagal Act of 1933)  and appointing Wall Street financiers at the helm of national economic policy. 
Thirdly, Clinton appointed leading Zionists to the key foreign policy positions  related to the Middle East, allowing them to insert Israel’s military view of  reality into strategic decision-making in Washington. 
Clinton put in place the  first series of repressive police state ‘anti-terrorist’ legislation and  expanded the national prison system. In sum, Bill Clinton’s Middle East war  policies, his ‘financialization’ of the US economy, his ‘war on terror’, his  Zionist orientation towards the Arab world and, above all, his own ideological  anti-welfarism led directly to Bush Junior’s full scale conversion of the  welfare state into the police state .
Exploiting the trauma of 9/11, the Bush and later the Obama regimes nearly  tripled the military budget and launched serial wars against Arab states. The  military budget rose from $359 billion in 2000, to $544 billion in 2004 and  escalated to $903 billion in 2012. 
Military expenditures financed major foreign  military occupations and colonial administrations in Iraq and Afghanistan,  border wars in Pakistan and US Special Forces covert operations (including  kidnappings and assassinations) in Yemen, Somalia, Iran and seventy-five other  countries world-wide.
Meanwhile financial speculation ran rampant, budget deficits ballooned,  living standards plunged, international trade deficits reached record levels and  public debt doubled in fewer than eight years. Multiple imperial wars dragged on  without end; the costs of these wars multiplied while the financial bubble  burst. 
The contradiction between domestic welfare and militarism exploded.  Finally, the massive roll back of basic social programs for all American topped  the Presidential and legislative agenda.
Previous ‘untouchable programs’ like Social Security, Medicare, the US Post  Office, public sector employment, services to the poor, elderly and handicapped  and food stamps were all put on the butcher’s block. 
At the same time the  federal government increased its funding of private military and police  contractors (mercenaries) overseas and extended the scope and depth of US  Special Forces clandestine operations. 
Bush-Obama vastly increased spending for  the military and espionage agents in support of wildly unpopular, brutal  collaborator regimes in Pakistan and Yemen. 
They funded and armed foreign  mercenaries in Libya, Syria, Iran, and Somalia. By the first decade of the new  century it had become clear that imperial militarism and domestic welfarism were  in a zero sum game: as imperial wars multiplied, domestic programs were  slashed.
The severity and depth of the cuts to popular domestic welfare programs were  only in part the result of imperial wars; equally important was the huge  increase in the funding for personnel and surveillance technology for the  burgeoning police state at home.
The Origins of the Conversion of the Welfare State to the Police  State
The precipitous decline of the welfare state and the dismantling of social  services, public education and access to affordable health care for the working  and middle classes cannot be explained by the demise of organized labor, nor is  it due to the ‘right-turn’ of the Democratic Party. Two other deep structural  changes loom large as fundamental to the proces: the transformation of the US  economy from a competitive manufacturing economy into a ‘FIRE’ (finance,  insurance and real estate) economy; and secondly, the rise of a vast police  legal-political-administrative state apparatus engaged in permanent ‘internal  warfare’ at home, designed to sustain and complement permanent imperial warfare  abroad.
Agencies and personnel of the police state expanded dramatically during the  first decade of the new century. The police state penetrated telecommunications  systems, patrolled and controlled transport outlets; dominated judicial  procedures and oversaw the major ‘news outlets’, academic and professional  associations. The expanded police state covertly and overtly entered the private  lives of tens of millions of Americans.
The loss to taxpayers in terms of citizen rights and the welfare state has  been staggering.
As the biggest and most intrusive component of the police state apparatus,  christened ‘Homeland Security’, grew exponentially, the budget and agencies  providing welfare and public services, health, education and unemployment  shrank. Tens of thousands of domestic spies have been hired and costly intrusive  spyware has been purchased with tax-payer money, while hundreds of thousands of  teachers and public health and social welfare professionals have lost their  jobs.
The Department of Homeland Security (as of the end of 2011) is composed of  approximately 388,000 employees, including both federal and contracted agents.  Between 2011-2013 the DHS budget of $173 billion has faced no serious cuts.  Homeland Security’s rapid expansion occurred at the expense of Health and Human  Services, education and the Social Security Administration, which currently face  large scale ‘retrenchment’.
Among the top officials, appointed by the Bush, Jr. Administration to key  positions in the police state apparatus, there are two who have been the most  influential in setting policy: Michael Chertoff and Michael Mukasey.
Michael Chertoff headed the Criminal Division of the Justice Department (from  2001 – 2003). During that time he was responsible for the arbitrary arrest of  thousands of US citizens and immigrants of Muslim and South Asian heritage, who  were held incommunicado without charge and subject to physical and psychological  abuse – without a single resident alien or Muslim US citizen linked to 9/11. 
In  contrast, Chertoff quickly intervened to free scores of Israeli spy suspects and  5 Israeli Mossad agents who had been witnessed filming and celebrating the  destruction of the World Trade Center and were under active investigation by the  FBI. 
More than any other official, Michael Chertoff has been the chief architect  of the ‘Global War on Terror’ – co-author of the notorious ‘Patriot Act’ which  trashed habeas corpus and other essential components of the US Constitution and  Bill of Rights. 
As Secretary of Homeland Security from 2005-2009, Chertoff  promoted ‘military tribunals’ and organized the vast internal spy network, which  now preys on private US citizens. 
Michael Mukasey, the Bush-appointed US Attorney General, was an enthusiastic  defender of the Patriot Act, supporting military tribunals, torture and overseas  assassinations of individual suspected of what he called ‘Islamic terrorism’  without trial.
Both Chertoff and Mukasey are zealous Zionists with longstanding ties to  Israel. Michael Chertoff was believed to hold dual US-Israeli citizenship as he  launched the Administration domestic war on US citizens.
A cursory review of the origins and direction of the police-state apparatus  and the top echelons of the global war on ‘Islamic terrorism’ – code languages  for military imperialism – reveals a disproportionate number of Israel-Firsters,  who placed greater importance on persecuting potential US critics of the Middle  East wars for Israel than in upholding Constitutional guarantees and the Bill of  Rights.
Back in ‘civilian’ life, Michael Chertoff profited greatly from the bogus  ‘War on Terror’ promoting radioactive and degrading body scanning technology in  airports throughout the US and Europe.He established his own security consulting  firm Chertoff Groups (2009) to represent the manufacturers of surveillance body  scanners. 
Americans can thank Michael Chertoff every time they pass through the  humiliation of an airport body scan.
The fusion of the police state apparatus with the industrial-security complex  and its prominent overseas links with its corporate security counterparts in the  state of Israel, underscores the imperial state’s ties to the Israeli military  establishment.
As the police state has grown it has created a powerful lobby of high tech  surveillance industry backers and beneficiaries who push federal and state  ‘security’ spending at the expense welfare programs.
The police state’s squeeze on social programs, education and welfare has a  powerful ally on Wall Street, which emerged as the dominant sector of US capital  in terms of access to and influence over US Treasury and its budgetary  allocations.
Unlike the manufacturing sector, financial capital does not need a  population of educated, healthy and productive workers. Its own ‘labor  force’ is composed of a small educated elite of speculators, analysts, traders  and brokers at the top and middle levels and a small army of ‘contract’ office  sweepers, secretaries and menial workers at the bottom. 
They have their own  ‘invisible’ army of domestic servants, cooks, caterers, gardeners and nannies  devoid of any ‘Social Security’, health coverage and pension plans. And the  financial sector has its own private networks of doctors and clinics, schools,  communications systems and messengers, estates and clubs, and security agencies  and body guards; it needs not an educated, skilled public sector; and it  certainly does not want national wealth to support high quality public health  and educational systems. It has no interest in supporting this mass of public  institutions which it views as an obstacle to ‘freeing up’ vast amounts of  public wealth for speculation. In other words, the dominant sector of capital  has no objection to ‘Homeland Security’; indeed it shares many sentiments with  the proponents of the police state and supports the shrinking the welfare state.  It is concerned about lowering taxes on finance capital and increasing Federal  bail-out funds for Wall Street while controlling the impoverished citizenry.
Conclusion
The conversion of a welfare state to a police state is the result of  militarized imperialism abroad and the ascendancy of finance capital at home, as  well as the proliferation of security state agencies and related private  industries and the strategic role of rightwing Zionists in top positions of the  police state apparatus.
This convergence of international and domestic structural changes took  hold during the 1980’s and 1990’s and then accelerated during the first decade  of the 21st century. 
The downgrading of the vast public services of the welfare  state was covered up by a massive government propaganda campaign to promote the  ‘global war on terror’ together with a fabricated widespread domestic ‘terrorist  threat’ involving the most hapless of suspects (including oddball Haitian  millenarianists entrapped by FBI agents). 
The supporters and beneficiaries of  the welfare state found themselves on the margins of any national debate. The  mass media/regime propaganda campaign demanded and successfully secured massive  increases in centralized powers of domestic policing, surveillance,  provocations, disappearances and arrests. 
Throughout the past decade what the  welfare state lost in support and funding, the police state gained. The rise of  financial capital and the deregulation of the financial system crowded out any  public subsidies to promote and sustain the competitiveness of the US  manufacturing sector. 
This has led to a major break in the links between  industry, labor and the welfare state. Huge tax write-offs to big business,  combined with the growth in expenditures for a non-productive police state  bureaucracy and the series of costly overseas wars, has caused unsustainable  budget and trade deficits, which then became the pretext to further savage the  welfare state.
Significant political, cultural and ideological shifts have aided the rise of  the police state over the public welfare state. The success of prominent  American Zionists in securing power within key media propaganda mills and  obtaining appointments to critical position in the top echelons of the police  state apparatus, judiciary and in the imperial state bureaucracy (Treasury and  State Department) has put Israel’s colonial interests and its own police-state  apparatus at the center of US politics. 
The US police state has adopted  Israeli-styled repression targeting US citizens and residents.
US society is now split into two sectors: the ‘winners’ linked to the  expanding and lucrative financial – security complex embedded in the police  state while the ‘losers’, tied to the manufacturing – welfare sector, are  relegated to an increasingly marginalized ‘civil society’. 
The police state  purges dissidents who question the ‘Israel-First doctrine’ of the US  security-military apparatus. The financial sector, embedded in its own luxurious  ‘cocoon’ of private services, demands the total gutting of public services  directed toward the poor, working and middle classes. The public treasury has  been taken over in order to finance bank bailouts, imperial wars and police  state agencies while paying the bondholders of US debt. 
Social Security is on target to be privatized. Pensions are to be reduced,  delayed and self-financed. Food stamps, access to affordable health care and  unemployment support will be slashed. 
The police state cannot pay for glitzy new  repressive technologies, greater policing, more intrusive surveillance, arrests  and prisons while financing the existing welfare state with its vast  educational, health and human services and pension benefits.
In sum, there is no future for social welfare in the United States within its  powerful financial-imperial-police state system. 
Both major political parties  nurture this system, support serial wars, appeal to the financial elites and  debate over the size, scope and timing for further cuts in social welfare.
The American social welfare system was a product of an earlier phase of US  capitalism where US global industrial supremacy allowed for both military  spending and welfare support and where US military spending was constrained by  the demands of the domestic socio-economic sectors of manufacturing capital and  ‘labor’. 
In an earlier phase Zionist influence was based on wealthy individuals  and their congressional ‘lobby’ — they did not occupy key Federal  policymaking positions setting the agendas for war in the Middle East and  domestic police state.
Times have changed for the worse: a police state, linked to militarism and  perpetual imperial wars in the Middle East has gained ascendancy and now impacts  our everyday life. 
Underlying both the growth of the police state and the  erosion of the welfare state is the rise of an inter-locking ‘financial-security  power elite’, held together by a common ideology, unprecedented private wealth  and the relentless drive to monopolize the public treasury to the detriment of  the vast majority of Americans. 
A confrontation and full exposure of all the  self-serving propaganda, which undergirds the power elite is an essential first  step. The enormous budgets for imperial wars are the greatest threat to US  welfare. 
The police state erodes real public services and undermines social  movements. Finance capital pillages the public treasury demanding bailouts and  subsidies for the banks. 
Israeli Firsters, in key decision-making positions,  serve the interests of a foreign police state against the interests of the  American people. 
The state of Israel is the mirror opposite of what we Americans  want for ourselves and our children: a free and independent secular republic  without colonial settlements, clerical racism, and destructive self-serving  militarism.
Today the fight to restore the advances in citizens’ welfare established  through public programs of the recent past requires that we transform an  entire structure of power: true welfare reform requires a revolutionary  strategy and, above all, a grass-roots mass movement breaking with the  entrenched ‘two party’ regime tied to the financial- imperial- internal security  system. 
VENEZUELA: LA AMENAZA DEL BUEN EJEMPLO
Venezuela: La Amenaza del Buen Ejemplo 
Eva Golinger
--Desde la primera vez que Hugo Chávez fue  electo presidente de Venezuela en 1998, Washington y sus aliados han intentado  socavar su mandato. 
--Cuando Chávez apenas era candidato presidencial, el gobierno  de Estados Unidos le negó una visa para participar en algunas entrevistas  televisadas en el país norteamericano.
--Luego, cuando ganó las elecciones presidenciales, el entonces embajador  estadounidense en Caracas, John Maisto, lo llamó personalmente para felicitarlo  y ofrecerle su visa. 
--Los meses siguientes fueron llenos de intentos de “comprar”  al nuevo presidente de Venezuela. Empresarios, políticos y jefes de estado desde  Washington a España lo presionaban para que se subordinara a sus agendas. “Vente  con nosotros”, le urgía el entonces primer ministro español, José María Aznar, seduciéndolo con  ofertas de lujo y riqueza, si simplemente cumplía con sus órdenes.
--Cuando Chávez no se dejó comprar, lo sacaron con un golpe de estado el 11  abril 2002, financiado y diseñado desde Washington. Cuando el golpe fracasó, y  el pueblo rescató la democracia y su presidente en menos de 48 horas, comenzaron  a desestabilizar al país, intentando hacerlo imposible para gobernar.  Desbordaron la nación con saboteos económicos, huelgas ejecutivas en la  industria petrolera, caos en las calles, y una brutal guerra mediática que  tergiversaba la realidad del país a nivel nacional e internacional. 
--El complot  para asesinarlo con paramilitares colombianos en mayo 2004 fue impedido por las  fuerzas de seguridad del país. Meses después, intentaron revocar su mandato a  través de un referéndum revocatorio en agosto 2004, pero el pueblo lo salvó con  un voto de 60-40.
--Mientras más popular se hacía, más millones fluían desde las agencias de  Washington a los grupos anti-chavistas para desestabilizarlo, desacreditarlo,  deslegitimarlo, derrocarlo, asesinarlo, o sacarlo de cualquier manera. 
--En  diciembre 2006, Chávez fue reelecto con 64% del voto. Su aprobación crecía  dentro de Venezuela y por toda América Latina. Nuevos gobiernos en Argentina,  Brasil, Bolivia, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Uruguay y varios países caribeños  se unieron a las iniciativas de integración, soberanía y unión latinoamericana y  caribeña impulsadas desde Caracas. Washington comenzó a perder su influencia y  control sobre su antiguo “patio trasero”.
--Fueron creados la Alianza Bolivariana para los  Pueblos de Nuestra América (ALBA), la Unión de  Naciones Suramericanas (UNASUR), PetroCaribe, PetroSur, TeleSUR, Banco de ALBA, Banco del Sur y la Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños  (CELAC). En ninguna de esas organizaciones está Washington, ni la élite que  antes dominaba la región, imponiendo sus intereses por encima de los  pueblos.
--En enero 2005, la nueva Secretaria de Estado, Condoleezza Rice, dijo que  Chávez era “una amenaza” para la región. Justo después, la Agencia Central de  Inteligencia (CIA) colocó a Venezuela en su lista de los “Top 5 Hot Spots” (5  lugares más inestables) del mundo. Unos meses luego, el reverendo estadounidense  Pat Robertson declaró públicamente que era mejor “asesinar” a Chávez ya en lugar  de iniciar una guerra contra Venezuela, que costaría millones de dólares. 
--Ese  mismo año, cuando Venezuela suspendió la cooperación con la Agencia Anti-Droga  de Estados Unidos (DEA), por estar inmiscuyéndose en sus asuntos internos,  espiando y saboteando sus trabajo anti-droga, Washington clasificó a Venezuela  como un país que “no coopera en la lucha contra el narcotráfico”. Nunca  presentaron pruebas para fundamentar sus graves acusaciones.
--En febrero 2006, el entonces Director Nacional de Inteligencia, John  Negroponte, se refirió a Venezuela como un “peligro” para Estados Unidos. El  Secretario de Defensa Donald Rumsfeld comparó a Chávez con Hitler. Ese mismo  año, Washington estableció una Misión Especial de Inteligencia para Venezuela y  Cuba, reorientando recursos de la comunidad de inteligencia estadounidense para  aumentar sus operaciones en estos lugares, considerados “amenazas” para Estados  Unidos. 
--En junio 2006, la Casa Blanca colocó a Venezuela en una lista de países  que “no apoyan suficientemente la lucha contra el terrorismo”, y lo sancionaron  con una prohibición de poder comprar armas y equipos militares de empresas  estadounidenses o aquellas con utilizan tecnología estadounidense. Nunca  mostraron evidencias de los supuestos vínculos de Venezuela con el  terrorismo.
--En 2008, el Pentágono reactivó la Cuarta Flota de la Armada, la comandancia  militar estadounidense encargada de América Latina y el Caribe. Había sido  desactivada en 1950 y no funcionaba desde entonces, hasta que decidieron que era  necesario aumentar la presencia “y fuerza” militar de Estados Unidos en la  región. 
--En 2010, Washington se acordó con Colombia para establecer 7 bases  militares en su territorio. Un documento oficial de la Fuerza Aérea de Estados  Unidos justificaba estas bases debido a la “amenaza de los gobiernos  anti-estadounidenses en la región”.
--En la prensa internacional, decían que Chávez  era un dictador, tirano, autoritario, narco, anti-americano, terrorista, pero  nunca presentaron pruebas para tan peligrosos sobrenombres. Convirtieron la  imagen de Venezuela en violencia, inseguridad, crimen, corrupción y caos, sin  mencionar los grandes logros y avances sociales durante la última década, ni las  causas de las desigualdades sociales dejadas desde gobiernos anteriores.
--Durante años, un grupo de congresistas estadounidenses, demócratas y  republicanos, han intentado colocar a Venezuela en su lista de “estados  terroristas”. Destacan la relación entre Venezuela e Irán, Venezuela y Cuba, y  hasta Venezuela y China, como evidencia de la “grave amenaza” que el país  suramericano representa para Washington. Intentaron destruir ALBA con el golpe  de estado contra Manuel Zelaya en Honduras en 2009. Buscaron debilitar la UNASUR  con el golpe contra Fernando Lugo en Paraguay en junio 2012. No funcionó.
--Dicen una y otra vez que Venezuela y Chávez son amenazas para Estados Unidos.  “Hay que pararlo”, dicen, antes de que “lancen sus bombas iraníes contra  nosotros”.
--El Presidente Barack Obama declaró en estos días que Chávez no era una  amenaza para la seguridad de Estados Unidos. El candidato Mitt Romney dijo que  sí. La furia de los extremistas miameros cayó encima de Obama. Pero no deben  preocuparse, porque Obama aumentó el financiamiento multimillonario a los  anti-chavistas este año. Son más de 20 millones de dólares que han canalizado de  las agencias estadounidenses para la campaña opositora en Venezuela.
--¿Es Venezuela una amenaza para Washington? En Venezuela, el único terrorismo  que hay es de los grupos que buscan desestabilizar al país, la mayoría con el  apoyo político y financiero de Estados Unidos. Los narcotraficantes son de  Colombia, donde la producción y transito de drogas han incrementado durante la  invasión estadounidense en ese país a través del Plan Colombia. La relación con  Irán, con Cuba, con China, con Rusia y con los demás países del mundo es una  cooperación bilateral - o multilateral - normal entre países. No hay bombas, no  hay planes de ataque, no hay secretos siniestros. No, Venezuela no es esa tipa de amenaza para Washington. Es otra.
--La pobreza ha sido reducida en más de 50% desde que Chávez llegó al poder en  1998. Las políticas de inclusión de su gobierno han creado una sociedad de alta  participación en las decisiones económicas, políticas y sociales. 
--Sus programas  sociales - las misiones - han garantizado atención médica gratuita, educación  gratis y accesible - desde los niveles básicos hasta los más avanzados -  alimentación en precios alcanzables, y herramientas para crear y mantener  cooperativas, empresas pequeñas y medianas, consejos comunales y comunas, para  todo el pueblo. 
--La cultura venezolana ha sido rescatada y valorada, recuperando  el orgullo e identidad nacional, creando un sentimiento de dignidad en lugar de  inferioridad. Medios de comunicación e información se han proliferados durante  la última década, asegurando espacios para la expresión de todos.
--La industria petrolera de Venezuela, nacionalizada en 1976 pero que  funcionaba como una empresa privada, ha sido recuperada al beneficio del país, y  no de las multinacionales y una minoría oligarca. Alrededor de 60% del  presupuesto anual se dedica a los programas sociales en el país, con el enfoque  principal en la erradicación de la pobreza.
--Caracas, la capital, ha sido embellecida. Los parques y plazas se han  convertido en espacios de reunión, disfrute y seguridad para los visitantes. Hay  música en las calles, arte en las paredes, y una rica debate de ideas entre los  habitantes. La nueva policía comunal trabaja en conjunto con las comunidades  para luchar contra los terribles problemas de la violencia, la inseguridad y la  delincuencia, problemas que no se atacan solamente desde el superficie, sino  desde la raíz.
--El despertar de Venezuela se ha expandido por todo el continente y hacia el  norte por el mar Caribe. El sentimiento de soberanía, independencia y unión en  la región ha enterrado la sombra de subdesarrollo y subordinación impuesta por  los poderes colonizadores durante siglos pasados.
--No, Venezuela no es una amenaza para la seguridad de Estados Unidos.  Venezuela es un ejemplo de como un pueblo levantador, frente a los obstáculos  más difíciles y la fuerza brutal de las grandes potencias, puede construir un  modelo en donde la justicia social reina, y la prosperidad humana se celebra por  encima de la prosperidad económica. Venezuela es el país en donde millones antes  invisibles, hoy son visibles, hoy tienen voz y el poder de decidir sobre el  futuro de su patria, sin ser asfixiados por las garras imperiales. Hoy, gracias  a la revolución liderada por el Presidente Chávez, Venezuela es uno de los  países más felices del mundo.
-----Esa es la amenaza que representa el Presidente Hugo Chávez y la Venezuela  Revolucionaria para Washington. Es la amenaza del buen ejemplo-----
(Tomado de MAPOCHO PRESS)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- ► 2010 (272)
- ► 2011 (344)
- ▼ 2012 (355)
- ► 2013 (352)
- ► 2014 (502)
- ► 2015 (416)
- ► 2016 (336)
- ► 2017 (333)
- ► 2018 (296)
- ► 2019 (298)
- ► 2020 (358)
- ► 2021 (359)
- ► 2022 (405)
- ► 2023 (314)
- ► 2024 (253)

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
%20FINAL%20PEQUE%C3%91A.jpg) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
