Trump vs. Hillary: “If Hillary gets into the Oval Office, I Predict Nuclear War before her First term is Over”
Global Research, August 24, 2016
The US presidential election this November will tell whether a majority of the US population is irredeemably stupid.
If voters elect Hillary, we will know that Americans are stupid beyond redemption.
We don’t know much about Trump, and anti-Trump propaganda rules in the place of facts.
We know from their words and deeds and material success that the Clintons are agents for Wall Street, the Big Banks, the military/security complex, Israel, agribusiness, and the extractive industries.
Their large personal fortune, approximately $120 million, and the $1,600 million in their foundation, much of which came from abroad in exchange for political favors, attests to the unchallengable fact that the Clintons are agents for the oligarchy that rules America, indeed, that rules the American Empire from Australia and Japan, through North America and Western and Eastern Europe to the Russian border.
We know that Hillary, like Bill, is a liar.
We know that Hillary is a warmonger.
We know that Hillary made the most irresponsible statement ever uttered by a presidential candidate when she declared the President of Russia to be the “new Hitler,” thereby raising tensions between the US and Russia to a higher level than existed during the Cold War.
We know that Hillary is allied with the neoconservatives and that her belief in the neocons’ ideology of US world hegemony is likely to result in war with Russia and China.
All we know about Trump is that the oligarchs,
-who sent America’s jobs overseas,
-who flooded the country with difficult-to-assimilate immigrants,
-who destroyed public education, who bailed out Wall Street and the “banks too big to fail,”
-who sacrificed American homeowners and retirees living on a fixed income,
-who intend to privatize both Social Security and Medicare,
-who have given the public killer cops, relentless violations of privacy, the largest prison poplulation in the world, and destroyed the US Constitution in order to increase executive power over the American people,
-are violently opposed to Trump.
This opposition should tell us that Trump is the person we want in the Oval Office.
Some claim that it is all a charade and that Trump is playing a role in order to elect Hillary. American politics are so corrupt that anything is possible.
However the ruling elites and their puppets seem to be genuinely concerned about Trump’s challenge to their control, and they have united against Trump.
They have used their money to buy up “progressive” websites paid to bring the print and TV anti-Trump propaganda onto the Internet, thus joining the Internet presstitutes with the print, TV, and NPR whores who are working overtime to demonize Trump and to elect Hillary.
The entire power structure of our country is behind Hillary. Both political parties, Democratic and Republican, and both ideologies, neoliberals and neoconservatives, are united behind Hillary.
How much more evidence do Americans need in order to know that a vote for Hillary is a vote for their own emasculation?
Apparently, Americans remain captives of their insouciance. According to news reports, a majority of voters still haven’t a clue about the consequences of voting for Hillary.
Polls report that Hillary is well in the lead. Are these real polls or just another presstitute lie to discourage Trump supporters? Why vote when they have already lost?
The propaganda assault against Trump, vicious as it was, did not succeed during the Republican primary.
Despite the media condemnation of Trump, he swept the other Republican candidates aside effortlessly.
The current media demonization of Trump might fail as well. Indeed, it is so transparent that it could elect him.
All that is required is for enough Americans to awake from their insousiance to recognize that it is the enemies of their own lives, their own living standards, and their own liberty who are violently opposed to Trump.
If Americans cannot reach this realization, they have no future, and neither does the planet Earth.
In other words, Trump is for America and for Americans.
Possibly, a vote for Trump is the same. However, in the case of Trump we do not know that. In the case of Hillary we most certainly do know it.
Of course, it could matter not how Americans vote. Those who program the electronic voting machines will determine the vote, and as the establishments of both political parties totally oppose Trump, the programmed machines can elect Hillary.
We know this from our electoral history. The US has already experienced elections in which exit polls show a winning candidate different from the candidate selected by the electronic machines that have no paper trail and no way of affirming the vote.
If you look at the forthcoming election realistically, you have no alternative but to conclude that the entirety of the presstitute media and American Establishment prefers the risk of nuclear war to the risk of losing control of the government to the voters.
The American people failed democracy, which requires accountable government. The American government has proven that it is not accountable to the US Constitution, to US statutory law, to international law, or to voters.
One would hope that with responsibility this great on their shoulders, the American people will reject the unequivocal war candidate and take their chances on holding Trump accountable to his words.
Me inclino a pensar como Paul Craig Robert.
Muy simple: sigo la misma hermenéutica con la que enfoco la política exterior del Imperium: cuándo la oligarquía imperialista se opone a lo que ocurre en cualquier país del mundo...me digo, malo, algo bueno deben de estar haciendo
Con el caso de Trump me pasa lo mismo, porque All we know about Trump is that the oligarchs...are violently opposed to Trump, como dice Craig Roberts.
Yo, personalmente, dadas las obvias y apocalípticas implicaciones que ello tiene para la entera Humanidad sobre el planeta, corro como Usain Bolt de alguíen que dice públicamente que Putin es el "new Hitler" . Correr vosotros de lo que queráis, pero ésto me causa mucha jindama.
Ademas, vamos a coger la telúrica persuasiva del Logos, y, siendo escépticos, digamos, como el autor del articulo, que, Possibly, a vote for Trump is the same. However, in the case of Trump we do not know that. In the case of Hillary we most certainly do know it. Posiblemente, un voto por Trump sea lo mismo (que por Hillary). Sin embargo, en el caso de Trump no sabemos eso; lo que sabemos es que es un billonario negociante y la guerra, sobre todo enfrentando a las grandes potencias actuales, Rusia y China, en lugar de representar un negocio rentable significaría la terminación de todos ellos.
En síntesis, recurramos al Principium rationis y razonablemente digamos que cualquier presidente del Imperium tendrá la misma obligación sobre sus espaldas: defender los intereses de los bandidos imperialistas. Vale. Correcto. Pero, como dice Craig Roberts, conocemos muy bien --por su diáfano curriculum histórico-- como los defenderá la señora de marras, pero no como, con precisión, lo hará el billonario. Si me dan elegir, en lugar de:
me quedo con:
Por si quedan dudas:
“If I’m President, We Will Attack Iran… We would be Able to Totally Obliterate Them.”
Global Research, August 28, 2016
Global Research 5 July 2015